پیام رسان بله
Challenges and obstacles facing the economic development of Inche Barun Industrial Free Zone
Challenges and obstacles facing the economic development of Inche Barun Industrial Free Zone
Mariam Ziaratban1 Arash Naderian2
1) Department of Accounting, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran
2) Department of Accounting, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran
IOI Code
:
AZCC-AZGBGC
Publication :
The second international conference on innovation, growth and development in the field of management, accounting and humanities(icimah.com)
Abstract :
This research has been conducted with the aim of the obstacles related to economic growth in the commercial-industrial free zone of Inchebarun. The descriptive research method is an exploratory survey, and the decision team includes 15 active experts and specialists in the field of economic free trade zones, who filled out the pairwise comparison questionnaire. In the first round, the criteria and sub-criteria of obstacles related to economic growth in Inchebarun Commercial-Industrial Free Zone were listed from articles, books and experts opinions, and after filling the identification questionnaire, the main and secondary criteria were identified. In the second round, the identified criteria and sub-criteria were evaluated using the standard questionnaire of pairwise comparisons and expert rating software. Then, using mathematical methods in three steps related to AHP, these criteria and its sub-criteria were rated by expert experts. In the main criteria, the criterion of internal obstacles with a weight of 0.673 is ranked first and then the criterion of external obstacles with a weight of 0.327 is ranked second. The sub-criteria of fading tax incentives with a final weight of 0.081 in the first rank, lack of investment in the field of knowledge base and lack of infrastructure development of free zones with a final weight of 0.075 in the second rank of importance, lack of investment guarantee and high investment risk with a final weight of 0.073 in the rank The third importance is the lack of balanced development and the sub-criterion of not forming an integrated management with a final weight of 0.071 in the fourth rank of importance and similarly to the sub-criterion of the lack of representative and sales offices abroad and the lack of good export incentives, sanctions and the lack of quality certification and lack of attraction. Foreign investment and the smallness of domestic versus foreign organizations are ranked 10th, 11th, and 12th with a final weight of 0.038, 0.035, and 0.032.